|
|
||
|
[Sorrowfully, it has come to my attention, that this article is being used by
a "Pastor" in NCY who is attempting to justify divorcing his wife. He evidently has been sending the link out to his friends to accomplish this. THIS IS NOT THE INTENT OF THIS ARTICLE. The preacher doing this should check his own salvation experience. If I hear that he is continuing this deceitful practice, I will publish his name in the future. - Bro Rowley]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This page was developed to help divorced people who have been given a Roman Catholic teaching adopted by most Baptists and other self-righteous pastors, who believe once divorced, a Christian is doomed to a life of loneliness. Nothing could be further from the truth. In the very beginning of the Bible God
said, "It is not good that the man should be alone." He has not changed his mind or repented. While God in no way favors divorce, he does not relegate everyone who has suffered this heartbreaking event to remain celibate for the rest of their earthly sojourn.
Many today have suffered in this matter of divorce. It is a heart rending experience. For new believers or those whose knowledge of the Scriptures is weak, but who in heart truly desire the Lord's will the problem is even tougher. Can I, a person who has never been divorced, marry someone who has been (and
vice versa)? Or: can I, a divorced person, marry someone else who has been divorced? Could someone who feels called to the ministry marry a divorced person. The list of questions goes on with one common denominator. Is marriage only for those persons who have never divorced? If I have been divorced, am I then consigned to being alone the rest of my life?
The typical answer from fundamental pastors is that once divorced remarriage is out of the question, and that if you remarry, you or your spouse is living in adultery. Usually the Scriptures quoted are:
Ro 7:2,3 For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of her husband. 3 So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be
dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man.
From this passage the answer given is that, once divorced there are no other options. The woman that has been divorced cannot remarry. But, in the passage in Deuteronomy, Which Paul refers to in this passage in Romans,( see below) the Bible is not talking about a divorced woman, but rather an
adulteress
woman. An Old Testament woman had no divorce options. The Old Testament woman was bound by the law as long as he was alive. If she "stepped" out on him, or left and married another man, she was an adulteress. (Which is the definition of adultery - a married person being unfaithful to their spouse).
The LAW says the woman cannot marry another man until her husband is dead. (Our present day civil laws say the same thing!) We will show why this scripture does not teach what many believe it does, and then show that although Paul does not recommend divorce or remarriage, it is permitted, and even encouraged
in some cases.
So, what does the Bible say, and why have so many bought into the "no re-marriage" teaching?
Look at the passage above. It sounds pretty convincing, doesn't it! "The law says . . !". The problem is that the whole quotation is taken out of context. "What is the context?", you say. Let's look. I will add emphasis is some places by using underline
Ro 7:1 Know ye not, brethren, (for I speak to them that know the law,) how that the law hath dominion over a man as long as he liveth? 2 For the woman which hath an husband is bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth; but if the husband be dead, she is loosed from the law of
her husband. 3 So then if, while her husband liveth, she be married to another man, she shall be called an adulteress: but if her husband be dead, she is free from that law; so that she is no adulteress, though she be married to another man. 4 wherefore, my brethren, ye also are become dead to the law
by the body of Christ; that ye should be married to another, even to him who is raised from the dead, that we should bring forth fruit unto God.
Notice what was missed! One, the passage is written to them that "know the law". Notice also that it has "dominion" over the man as long as he lives. These are Hebrew Christians - in other words, Hebrew Christians who know " the law" that Paul is addressing. They
are still confused as to their complete deliverance from the law. Paul is
teaching them that It no longer has DOMINION over them! (If it does - now - we are all still under bondage to every jot and tittle of it!)
What "law" is he talking about?
He is referring to the Mosaic Law given to Israel, and it was gracious compared to today's modern understanding. Notice:
De 24:1 When a man hath taken a wife, and married her, and it come to pass that she find no favour in his eyes, because he hath found some uncleanness in her: then let him write her a bill of divorcement, and give it in her hand, and send her out of his house. De 24:2 And when she is departed out of his
house, she may go and be another man's wife.
She could re-marry here even if she were the cause of the divorce! So then, what
is the Scripture saying and what is it not saying here in Romans 7?
Under the Old Testament system there is no situation in which a woman could divorce her husband. When he was dead she was then free. Paul was simply using this Old Testament truth to illustrate our death to the law and how that frees us to be "married" unto Christ. We, praise God,
are NOT under that law.
Paul is simply illustrating our relationship under grace to the Lord Jesus Christ, to a bunch of Jewish Believers who know the law. Their familiarity with the law was confusing them. He says that in the same way an old testament woman who's husband was dead was free to remarry, believers are now
DEAD to the law (get it!), and free to "Marry" Christ. Romans seven is not teaching
anything in particular about divorce and remarriage, and It was not meant to bind Christians to an old testament
rule. Rather it teaches the opposite! We are free from the law! Christ ministered under the law while teaching Israel the rules under which his
millennial kingdom would be administered. That is what, for instance, the book of Matthew is all about. It is about the one who was the King of the Jews. It opens in chapter 2 with wise men asking:
"Where is he that is born King of the Jews?" Matthew preaches a kingdom gospel. It is quite a bit different from what Paul teaches us. When Christ healed people, he often instructed them to offer the sacrifice that Moses commanded to the priest. His ministry was primarily to Israel."
Mt 15:24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel."
We can gain understand by placing the books in their "rightly
divided" proper dispensational places. When Jesus spoke to the Pharisees in
Matthew 19:9 and told them: And I say unto you, Whosoever shall put away his wife, except it be for fornication, and shall marry another, committeth adultery: and whoso marrieth her which is put away doth commit adultery. He
was not speaking to church age saints. Our instructions come from Paul, the
apostle to the Gentiles. Jesus spoke to those still under the mosaic law,
and gave them instructions on what the rule would be in the millennial kingdom
(which was the "gospel" He and John the Baptist were preaching) [I
know that will generate questions. Remember that he was born KING of the Jews -
hence he was preaching a "kingdom gospel". There is not space in this
discourse on divorce to go into that.] NOW, what was he saying? Pay close
attention here. It will clear up a LOT of misunderstanding. He was telling them
that in the Kingdom, (Millennium when he is KING of KINGS) the Old Testament
standard of "because he hath found some uncleanness in her"
will no longer hold. The only grounds for divorce in that age will be
fornication. Fornication has been mis-defined in our modern times. It's meaning
is any kind of illicit sexual activity, including bestiality. The kingdom rules
are not in effect for YOU doctrinally. You are not under bondage.
That does not mean that we cannot gain understanding from what he said, it only means that we must be careful applying the Old Testament standards to our lives under the grace of God. Paul says, " Ro 15:16 That I should be the minister of Jesus Christ to the Gentiles. . ."
If then we are going to look for instruction in this vital area, we should go where Paul deals with it directly, and not where he uses Old Testament law in an illustrative manner. Let's look at 1Corintians chapter 7. I suggest you view the remainder of this page with your King James Bible open to the
chapter. We will print selected portions here, but want you to be able to see the complete context. Let's start:
1Co 7:8 I say therefore to the unmarried and widows, It is good for them if they abide even as I. 9 But if they cannot contain, let them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn.
In order to understand the passage, you must: (1) believe the Book as it stands. (2) leave the meaning of the English words as they stand. What do they say?
Vrs 8 - say therefore to the unmarried and widows ... Is a divorced person married? Not according to the word of God. In the Old Testament example, when the husband gave the wife a divorce, she was no longer married. She could then become another man's wife. There is a peculiar line of thinking that makes
the "unmarried person" in the verse a "never married person". While it is true that someone who has never married is "unmarried", it is equally true that someone who has been divorced is "unmarried". What then saith the scriptures? 9 But if they cannot contain, let
them marry: for it is better to marry than to burn. The second thing to understand, that is in this chapter is that Paul gives the direct will of God and the permissive will of God. You will notice that in verse 10 he says "And unto the married I command, yet not I, but the Lord, Let not the wife depart from her husband:". Is what Paul
writes in this chapter as much Holy Scripture as what he quotes the Lord saying? Absolutely! But the Lord says the wife should not depart from her husband, and if she does (verse 11) she should remain unmarried. This seems like a contradiction of terms compared to verse 8. The answer lies in verse 6.
1Co 7:6 But I speak this by permission, and not of commandment'. Paul was simply giving the Corinthians God's permissive will for those who found themselves with a longing which was built into the human race, and those with a burning to release built in physical desire in a way that would be within
the will of God.
Let's go to verse 15
1Co 7:15 But if the unbelieving depart, let him depart. A brother or a sister is not under bondage in such cases: but God hath called us to peace.
Now, for illustration, suppose a brother wants to marry a divorced Christian lady who was abused and battered by her former husband. He is nervous about it. He wants to do the right thing. She divorced him for personal safety reasons. He was abusive and adulterous. Question: Did she leave her husband or
did he leave her? On first sight it would appear she left him, but man looketh on the outward appearance, and God looketh on the heart. When Israel departed from the Lord, she did not leave physically, but in her heart. When this woman's husband abused her mentally and physically, he was the one who left her.
His heart was with another woman. She is free in Christ to marry whomsoever she will, only in the Lord, and in her case by two reasons in the chapter. (1) verse 9, (look at it again!) and secondly verse 15.
Now let's go a little further: " 1Co 7:27 Art thou bound unto a wife? seek not to be loosed. Art thou loosed from a wife? seek not a wife. 28 But and if thou marry, thou hast not sinned; and if a virgin marry, she hath not sinned. Nevertheless such shall have trouble in the flesh: but I
spare you.
What do the above verses teach? Paul concludes this theme saying (I am going to paraphrase here) Are you married? Don't seek to be divorced. Are you divorced? Don't seek to get married. BUT if you are divorced, and you re-marry, YOU HAVE NOT SINNED. AND if a divorced man marries a virgin, he has
not sinned.
Now, last of all, some people come away from the whole chapter confused because Paul concluded the chapter with the verse we started with in Romans 7: 1Co 7:39 The wife is bound by the law as long as her husband liveth; but if her husband be dead, she is at liberty to be married to whom she will; only
in the Lord. 40 But she is happier if she so abide, after my judgment: and I think also that I have the Spirit of God.
Is he contradicting everything he just said? Obviously not. He is simply saying that the law God gave in the old testament was not without practical value. She should stay with her husband. It should be "till death do us part". BUT we are not under the law, and the entire chapter was written to
deal with this problem. Read it carefully, and if you have been through this heartrending experience, and remarry or have already remarried. Re-read verses 27 and 28, and don't let well meaning believers put you in bondage again to the law that Christ nailed to his cross. Please take the time to read the
entire chapter carefully. If something I have written here is unclear, please email me and we can discuss it with an open heart and an open Bible. It is only my desire to help.
|
||